Dear friends, I am writing to you in my capacity as your Mayor, in order to defend my integrity and that of the councillors who serve with me.
It has been a year since I was re-elected and I have chosen to ignore the biased coverage of the Suburban until now, but if falsehoods are repeated often enough, people begin to believe that there may be something to them.
Democracy only works if residents have access to the truth. I urge you to read this e-mail carefully and to forward it to Hampstead residents on your e-mail lists.
Could the Suburban really be biased? This Wednesday the Suburban ran a front page story by the editor Beryl Wajsman titled, “Gonshor sues Hampstead.” It is supposedly an original news article by the editor. That same Wednesday, the NDG Free Press published a letter from the four candidates who were not elected: Miller, Sternthal, Gordon, and Gross. (links to both pieces are at the bottom of this e-mail).
The Suburban “news article” is remarkably similar to the Miller et al. letter. Here are just a few examples:
Suburban – “For 20 years, Councilor Abe Gonshor has served the citizens of Hampstead.”
Letter – “For 20 years, ... councilor, Abe Gonshor has served the citizens of Hampstead.”
Suburban – “He has never been defeated in an election for a council seat.”
Letter – “- never defeated in an election for a council seat.”
Suburban – “At a certain point the Government of Quebec decided to require that all municipalities enact Codes of Ethics. Mayor Steinberg drafted a Code ... deliberately framed in a manner to punish Gonshor.”
Letter – “When the Quebec government proposed a law that all municipalities enact codes of ethics, Steinberg immediately drafted his perception of an appropriate code, deliberately framing it to punish Gonshor.”
The last example is particularly interesting, as both the letter and the article make the same error. In fact, the Hampstead code was adopted
BEFORE the Quebec government tabled their draft legislation.
So who is writing the “news” that the Suburban is publishing about Hampstead? How many other articles has the Suburban published that are uncritical parroting of letters or are based on instructions from the failed candidates? There are many other examples of biased reporting by the Suburban. Here are just a few examples:
Bias in choice of letters to print The Suburban has published numerous letters by Daniel Miller but when Jack Edery, our councillor with the finance portfolio, wrote rebuttal letters, not one was printed.
Telling only half the story The Suburban has printed numerous articles on the lack of decorum at council meetings and about my issuing tickets and evicting residents. What they didn’t tell their readers was how the four failed candidates and a few of their supporters behaved. They hooted, hollered, catcalled, booed, laughed hysterically, screamed from their seats and were generally disruptive, rude and disorderly. These are the people who have been getting the tickets or have been evicted. Ordinary residents with questions or comments are respectful and always welcome at council meetings.
Failure to clearly tell the truth about Hampstead’s finances After a year of explanations (including a private meeting) by Hampstead’s highly respected external auditor, the Town’s Director General, Treasurer, Assistant Treasurer and two councillors who have held the finance portfolio last mandate and this mandate, the Suburban has still failed to refute the false statements from Miller et al. about our finances. The one article which supposedly claimed to clarify the issue was written in such a way as to try to make Hampstead look bad. Why can’t the Suburban clearly state that Miller et al. are wrong? There is no accumulated deficit but rather an accumulated surplus of over $1 million, as we have always said. Local taxes did not go up by 23%, as the Miller et al. group predicted but only by 1.6%. Borrowing is not excessive, as the failed candidates claimed. Our already low debt service ratio will be dropping even further over the next two years as we repay loans that are coming due. It was and continues to be ludicrous to claim that Hampstead is virtually bankrupt when our finances are rock solid.
Gonshor’s refusal to sign the Hampstead Code of Ethics Finally, the Suburban accuses us of unfairly removing Gonshor from caucus and preventing him from doing his job. They are wrong. Six of seven members of the council have signed on to an excellent and strong code of ethics. Why won’t Gonshor sign it? As soon as he does, he will be welcomed back to caucus meetings. Meantime, he gets all the necessary information that he needs to do his job as a councillor. This includes being invited to pre-council meeting information sessions where we review all items on each month’s council agenda.
Why would the Suburban be biased against us? I cannot read the mind of the publisher of the Suburban so only he knows why the quality of his paper’s coverage of Hampstead is what it is. However, the evidence does show that the coverage is incredibly one-sided, partisan, and deeply unfair.
As always, if you have any comments, questions or issues on this or anything related to Hampstead I would love to hear from you. You can reach me online (e-mail / facebook) or at my home office 7 days a week (514) 483-6954.
Sincerely,
Bill
The Suburban article:
http://www.myvirtualpaper.com/doc/The-Suburban/thesuburbanoctober27_2010/2010102701/ The NDG Free Press letter (page 22):
http://ndgfreepress.com/FPv2.10.d.pdf *******
Please consider
subscribing so that you will get future messages directly. I send mass e-mails very rarely and you can always
unsubscribe.